Abbreviations:
A legal principle granting a digital person full autonomy within the digital space—independent management of identity, assets, participation signals, and rights without external coercion. Individual sovereignty in the Digital Institutional Platform (CIP) is legally supported through a unique Digital Polycentric Institute (DPI), which guarantees autonomous management of rights, property, services, and participation in network processes.
A spontaneously formed community of digital persons, systems, institutions, and algorithms that operates on the principles of freedom, equality, justice, and self-organization. It is not merely a technological network but a civilizational form of social organization, where algorithms, humans, and institutions act within a single legal framework built on freedom, equality, and justice.
A model of inter-civilizational interaction of digital personalities within the CIP, based on the principles of civil rights (“Ius civis”), digital sovereignty, and technological democracy.
A type of digital relationship emerging as self-organized, polycentric connections among digital persons, based on free exchange and collaboration.
A Polycentric Institute (DPI) is a digital account-institute providing basic services within the CIP and acting as a hub for a person’s digital presence. The DPI represents a digital person institutionally, ensuring autonomy, service activity, and rights within the CIP’s polycentric ecosystem. It has full autonomy in decision-making, contracting, and owning digital property.
Structural Features:
Legal Features:
Conceptual Basis:
Implements the principles of “polycentric governance” by Elinor Ostrom: multiplicity of institutions, decentralized decision-making, coordination instead of subordination (Nobel Lecture: Elinor Ostrom).
A DPI is a person’s digital institute in the CIP, provided to each individual by a charitable foundation as a basic digital structure ensuring identity, service interaction, receipt of basic social passive income, and sovereign management of digital rights.
A decentralized system uniting digital institutes, neuro-adaptive algorithms, and digital law to organize fair network interactions. CIP is not only a technological system but also a legal architecture of a new type of global interaction, combining artificial intelligence, neuromorphic architecture, digital law, and institutional engineering regulation. It serves as the foundation for the International Hub for Sustainable Development Project Management to deploy the core of the new international security system.
A functional unit of the CIP, analogous to a neuron’s behavioral function: records actions, interprets context, verifies signals, legitimizes decisions.
A neuromarker of a DPI’s digital identity—a vector of trust or participation that serves as a sign of legitimacy and facilitation between subjects.
A protocol, one of the DPI’s basic services in the CIP, through which agreements are concluded in real time considering context, network state, and values, according to UNCITRAL principles.
A neuromorphological system of legal norms and algorithms in the CIP, ensuring a balance of freedom, equality, and justice.
A universal form of ownership of digitized material and digital assets — primary, derivative, aggregated, and dynamic (data, algorithms, models, code, content, digital roles, algorithms, replications, and neurochain states) — with the rights of access, control, transfer, protection, and management of these assets within the Digital Institutional Platform (DIP).
An institutionally autonomous digital subject (DPI personality) with rights, duties, and the capacity to act within the CIP.
A financial unit for transactions within the digital society, backed by digital property. This currency is not speculative—it functions solely as a medium of exchange, distribution of Citizens’ Passive Income (CPD), and support of inter-institutional justice within the CIP.
The right of a digital person to control their digital presence, assets, identity, and network relationships.
Actions or operations within the CIP: resource exchange, contracting, participation in services.
A model of digital behavior manifested as a result of interactions between humans, algorithms, and cultural context, based on eternal values: freedom, equality, justice.
A non-selective behavioral reaction to external factors or embedded programs, forming patterns without external influence.
The process of algorithmically reproducing and scaling patterns of eternal values, models, and institutions in the CIP to ensure stable network development.
Automated systems are digital tools, including software-algorithmic constructs (code, bots, interfaces, neuroagents, or AI models) and other hardware-software complexes.
Legal-Style Definition:
A CIP subplatform is a polycentric institute of digital society created under a license for cooperative activity, implementing own or joint initiatives within the Digital Institutional Platform (CIP) while fully respecting the principles of freedom, equality, and justice.
Key Features:
A philosophical-legal concept of digital society organization, based on every digital person’s right to an inalienable ideal share in collective digital property within the CIP, realized via social passive income.
A guaranteed share of digital property allocated to each digital person within CIP, providing economic stability, reducing social gaps, supporting digital society connectivity, and enhancing international security.
The DPI within the CIP is a personalized intellectual interface allowing intuitive and logical management of rights, services, and value-driven behavior through neuro-polycentric mechanisms, digital contracts, and participation cross-signals.
A principle ensuring continuity, coherence, and interaction of all elements of digital society—persons, institutions, contracts, and neurochains, aligned with core values of freedom, equality, and justice.